The Great Outdoors (Original DVD & BD)
BOX-ART
-_-_-_-_-
All versions of the film on home video have some variant of the theatrical poster on the cover, with renders of the lake, Chet & Roman. The back has various screenshots from the film, along another render of Chet/Roman. The usual tech specs are at the bottom with a film synopsis in the center. The layout is different between Blu-Ray & DVD, but the same images are used.
MENUS
-_-_-
The DVD menu is styled the way many early DVD's were; static with no animations or music. It also has sub menus with tedious production notes & bios you can go through one at a time. And yes, much like a lot or 90's DVDs those are considered "bonus features." It's interesting to note that unlike most modern menus that would have play at the top as the default button, here it's at the bottom and chapters is the default. My theory is that maybe this was intended to be an early DVD release, but they just never released it until much later. That would explain too, why the film is letterboxed as opposed to anamorphic. The backgrounds are a mixture of cast renders, with artwork of the lake from the film. Some menus have additional renders of the racoons and/or the bear too. Options are overlaid on top of buttons that look like wood planks.
The Blu-Ray, rather lazily, has no main menu. All options must be managed via the overlay system during playback. I'm not a huge fan of this, I mean really... how hard would it be to have a simple static image at the start for menu options?
AUDIO
-_-_-
Both the DVD & Blu-Ray feature stereo English & French mixes. The DVD has the advantage though, of being Dolby Surround, whereas the Blu-Ray is simply 2.0. The French track is also only 2.0 (with no matrix encoding) on both versions, but is DTS instead of Dolby Digital on Blu-Ray.
I get that they wanted to use a 2.0 set-up because that's technically accurate to how it was presented in theaters (and maybe they didn't have a discrete mix?), but DTS-HD MA tracks can't do matrixing so why not also include the Dolby Surround mix from the DVD? Even if it was lossy, it would still give you the option to choose whether you want uncompressed audio or the original surround experience.
VIDEO
-_-_-
The stand alone DVD release of the film is presented in a letterbox full-screen format. The versions bundled with other films are anamorphic, and based on the same transfer as the Blu-Ray. This version appears the be from a film print, rather than the remastered version used later on. As such, it looks a bit more worn with print debris and such. Colors look more warm & subdued but with decent colors & clarity. Grain seems in tact with no signs or digital tampering. It's not terrible, but the newer version looks better for sure. The biggest issue is the mediocre resolution thanks to the letterboxing.
The Blu-Ray looks pretty much how you might expect. Colors are more vivid, with better grain & compression management. The framing is slightly looser, gaining you a bit more image on all side. I'd say the biggest different between the DVD & Blu-Ray is contrast and red levels. Red colors look so much better here, and are a faded almost orangey-red on the DVD. At times contrast is a bit blown out too, with more the Blu-Ray managing the white levels better.
FINAL THOUGHTS
-_-_-_-_-_-_-
I'm not sure what's up with the timing of the releases, as both came out ten years after their respective home video formats, but at least they're available. It seems none of these John Candy films are getting remasters though either, but seeing as how it took so long for the originals, who knows if/or when 4K versions may pop up!
I always really liked this film, I guess because I saw it a lot on TV as a kid. It's also similar to National Lampoons Vacation, which Is another dysfunctional family vacation themed movie I like. Also, speaking of seeing this on TV as a kid, I remember there being an awkward censored version, that I don't think they use anymore. I specifically remember the, "blow it out your ass, " line being overdubbed to, "blow it out your kazoo." The other week, it was on TV and they simply muted swears like that. I'm not sure if they just no longer use the older dub, or if it depends on who airs it or what? It's also worth noting that this dub is not on any home video version.
TECH. SPECS.
-_-_-_-_-_-
ASPECT RATIO: 1.85:1 (Original Widescreen)
NUMBER OF DISCS: 1
DISC SIZE: Single-Layer (DVD) / Dual-Layer (BD)
REGION CODE: 1 (DVD)
VIDEO CODEC: MPEG-2 / AVC (31.9 MB/s)
AUDIO: 24 Bit English DTS-HD MA 2.0 (3.6 MB/s)
English 2.0 Dolby Surround (192 KB/s | DVD)
French 2.0 Dolby Digital (192 KB/s | DVD)
French 2.0 (DTS 768 KB/s | BD)
SUBTITLES: English SDH, Spanish (DVD Only)
RUN-TIME: 1 Hour 30 Minutes
Uncle Buck (Blu-Ray)
BOX-ART
-_-_-_-_-
The cover art is a neat symbolic render, showing how the family is very reluctant to invite Uncle Buck into their lives. They are inside the house attempting to keep the door shut, whilst Buck is on the other side nocking to get in. The back is quite generic, with only a render of Buck and two films stills. The background is plain white, with only a few text blurbs getting colored boxes behind them. Tech specs are in a grid at the bottom, with the films description toward the top.
MENUS
-_-_-
The menus are the same Universal menus. Universal, as in the same for almost every film they release. They really shot them themselves in the foot, in regards to creativity, by having every disc use the same generic looking menu with video clips behind it. I guess it's less work for them though, and if ain't broke don't fix it...I guess?
AUDIO
-_-_-
This audio is, unfortunately, not lossless. It is, instead, a 24 Bit DTS stereo track. The film was mixed in Dolby Stereo, so I'm assuming a discrete remix was never made, which is why it's being presented as 2.0. However, I'm not sure why they didn't use Dolby Digital Surround encoding instead of DTS, so that we could get the proper surround matrixing. Also, I don't think most studios use 24 bit encoding on lossy Blu-Ray audio, so at least we're getting a higher bit-depth.
The audio compression is bizarre, there's more than enough space on the disc for fully uncompressed audio. I'm guessing maybe they were shooting for a single-layer disc, but went over a bit (Based on the 25.2 Gb the disc uses.) and simply decided to spill over onto a dual-layer disc. The problem is, that now there's approximately twenty-five gigabytes of unused space that could have been filled with lossless audio! (And/or extras.)
VIDEO
-_-_-
The video quality is rather middle of the road. Grain structure seems in tact with no noise reduction. Colors aren't the most vibrant and while black levels are fine, there's some clipping in the highlights. Every now & then you can see some tiny film debris, but it's not a big issue. The biggest issue is the over sharpening, which leads to haloing at times and an overall over processed look.
FINAL THOUGHTS
-_-_-_-_-_-_-
There are no extras, even if the back of the box tries to make BD Live & Pocket BLU seem like they are. It's kind of disappointing to have zero extras. You'd think to make up for the lossy audio they would include some extras. I'm glad we got the film on BD, it's just a shame that it's not the best it could be. It's better than nothing: is the general vibes I get from this release.
TECH. SPECS.
-_-_-_-_-_-
ASPECT RATIO: 1.85:1 (Original Widescreen)
NUMBER OF DISCS: 1
DISC SIZE: Dual-Layer (25.2)
REGION CODE: Region Free
VIDEO CODEC: AVC (32.58 MB/s)
AUDIO: 24 Bit English DTS 2.0 (384 KB/s)
SUBTITLES: English SDH
RUN-TIME: 1 Hour 40 Minutes